Critical Analysis of Partiality of Judges and its Impact on Legal Landscape of Pakistan

Clicks: 7
ID: 334459
2024
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #643 of 1,064 articles by views in Annals of Human and Social Sciences

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 1,064 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Partiality of judges in Pakistan is a complex and persistent issue. Judiciary has been facing numerous challenges since the creation of Pakistan. Independence of judiciary is fully secured under the Constitution of 1973 by which, the Judges should fix and decide the matters in front of them without any pressure and influence. Judges are considered to be custodian of constitutional as well as fundamental rights. In last few decades, judiciary has been highly influenced by politicians and other institutions to get favor and to achieve political interests and personal benefits. Furthermore, there are various key factors which contribute to partiality of judges such as favoritism in the appointment, political influence, personal interests and corruption. The biasness and partiality of judges has raised tensions among branches of government particularly judiciary and the executive. By qualitative research, the objective of this paper is to examine the partiality of judges and their impact on legal cases which has compromised on judiciary’s independence, adherence to the law and protection of constitutional as well as fundamental rights. The outcomes of this research propose that impartiality of judiciary is crucial for the administration of justice and protection of constitutional as well as fundamental rights..
Reference Key
imported_1793227390_6ae27a7e82609 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Noman Ali Shah, Faisal Awais
Are you one of these authors? Claim your profile
Journal Annals of Human and Social Sciences
Year 2024
DOI
10.35484/ahss.2024(5-IV)05
URL
https://ojs.ahss.org.pk/journal/article/view/824
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.