Civil–Military Relations and Their Impact on Democratic Governance in Pakistan

Clicks: 7
ID: 334457
2025
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #641 of 1,064 articles by views in Annals of Human and Social Sciences

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 1,064 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Since the country's independence, civil-military relations (CMR) have dominated Pakistani politics. The role of military influence patterns in Pakistani democratic government from 2010 to 2024 will be examined in this essay, including patterns of military influence through formal institutions, unofficial political interventions, resource distribution, and security policymaking. By combining a review of the literature (formatted literature), a qualitative analysis of significant civil-military episodes (2018–2024), and a small-sample quantitative estimation of the magnitude of military influence on democratic outcomes using cross-temporal indicators of democratic performance (V-Dem) and military influence (military expenditure as a percentage of GDP; coded instances of overt military political intervention), the study assessed the direction and magnitudes of military influence on democratic outcomes. It has been concluded that sustainable democratic government in Pakistan should involve long-term, gradual institutional amendments to decrease incentives to military political participation, and enhance civilian capacity to handle security without prioritizing democratic standards.
Reference Key
imported_1793227384_6ae27a78e7b9d Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors
Journal Annals of Human and Social Sciences
Year 2025
DOI
10.35484/ahss.2025(6-I)51
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.