Divide and Rule: How British Policies Contributed to Communal Tensions in India

Clicks: 7
ID: 334406
2025
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #616 of 1,064 articles by views in Annals of Human and Social Sciences

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 1,064 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
This paper examines how the outcomes of British colonial policies, particularly the Divide ‎and Rule strategy, contributed to the rise of communal tensions in India. Building on the ‎framework of colonial policies, the study discusses key measures, including the Morley-‎Minto Reforms of 1909, the Partition of Bengal in 1905, and the Communal Award of ‎‎1932, highlighting their detrimental effects on religious and social integration. Employing ‎historical, descriptive, and analytical research methods, this dissertation draws upon ‎primary sources, official documents, and historical writings to trace the evolution of ‎communalism under British colonial rule. The study reveals that institutionalised ‎communal representation, selective empowerment, and the management of socio-‎religious identities fostered mistrust among various communities. To address these ‎enduring colonial legacies in contemporary South Asia, the research suggests three critical ‎interventions: historical reconciliation, inclusive education, and interfaith dialogue. The ‎findings underline the profound and long-term socio-political implications of colonial ‎divisiveness on the regional order, offering insights into the enduring challenges posed by ‎these historical strategies.
Reference Key
imported_1793227272_6ae27a08964f0 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors
Journal Annals of Human and Social Sciences
Year 2025
DOI
10.35484/ahss.2025(6-I)02
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.