Politics of Idealism and Policy of Realism: A Stakeholder’s Perspective of Gaps in National Security Policy of Pakistan 2022-2026

Clicks: 8
ID: 334402
2025
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #260 of 1,064 articles by views in Annals of Human and Social Sciences

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 1,064 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
This paper seeks to uncover important elements of Pakistan's National Security Policy 2022–2026, by contrasting it with the policies of the United States and India. Identifying gaps aid help in determining prospective changes. This study examines the national security issues like civil-military interactions, political stability, external threats, regional isolation, and the necessity of a geo-economic focus for improved human security Open- ended, semi-structured questions are employed in the qualitative method using snowball sampling reach out reticent experts. Findings reveals that political governments carry rhetoric of idealism but state policy remains embroiled with realism. Critical issues such as Kashmir, misuse of Islamic ideology fueling extremism, and inclusive stakeholder engagement remain inadequately addressed. Security institutions dominate policymaking, sidelining diplomatic and intellectual contributions. The NSP neglects Pakistan’s ideological underpinnings and public perspectives. The paper advocates a shift toward a people-centered approach that integrates societal, economic, and administrative dimensions, aligning security with broader national development goals
Reference Key
imported_1793227263_6ae279ff02736 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors
Journal Annals of Human and Social Sciences
Year 2025
DOI
10.35484/ahss.2025(6-III)65
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.