An Exploration of Relational Betrayal Trauma, Attachment Styles and Well-Being in Relation to Socio-Demographic Difference between Clinical and Non-Clinical Samples of Faisalabad, Pakistan

Clicks: 7
ID: 334387
2025
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #609 of 1,064 articles by views in Annals of Human and Social Sciences

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 1,064 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
The aim of the study was to investigate the difference among demographic variables on the level of relational betrayal trauma, attachment styles and well-being. Certain demographics characteristics play vital role in different psychological constructs to shape their overall well-being. The study includes a young adult sample. Neurotic patients with stress, anxiety, and depression from several Faisalabad hospitals made up the clinical sample. With a sample size of N=120, 60 university students and 60 clinical group members were included in comparative study. The test administration includes Relational betrayal trauma scale (RBTS) (Akram & Qureshi, 2024), Scale of General Well-being (SGWB) (Longo et al., 2017) and Scale of Adult Attachment Measure (SAAM) (Collins & Read, 1990). The data analysed by SPSS 26 showed both non-significant demographics unrelated to the study variables and just a few of significant demographics connected to the study variables. The current study recommends the future psychologists and researchers to understand the components that aid them to develop better social understanding to take remedial actions.
Reference Key
imported_1793227211_6ae279cb2d8ca Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Kashf Qureshi, Fozia Akram, Asma Riaz Hamdani
Are you one of these authors? Claim your profile
Journal Annals of Human and Social Sciences
Year 2025
DOI
10.35484/ahss.2025(6-III)50
URL
https://ojs.ahss.org.pk/journal/article/view/1068
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.