AI, Autonomous Weapons, and the Crisis in International Humanitarian Law

Clicks: 8
ID: 334351
2025
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #246 of 1,064 articles by views in Annals of Human and Social Sciences

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 1,064 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
This paper elaborates critically on how the Artificial Intelligence (AI) and autonomous weapon systems (AWS) are fundamentally challenging the International Humanitarian Law (IHL). The recent developments of AI in the Military also prompt legal and ethical challenges in IHL. Autonomous weapon systems (AWS) are designed in a way that enables them to select the targets they intend to attack and carry this out without the interference or control of a human being. The study regarding AWS and IHL produce a qualitative critical review of the pertinent literature, the legal frameworks, and policy documents. AI/AWS, by their natures, violate the principles of distinction, proportionality and precaution of IHL because of their inabilities to mirror human intuition, sentiment, and awareness. This leaves a serious accountability gap resulting in weak individual accountability over IHL offenders. The review determines that operational legal frameworks are strained and requires a new legally binding instrument to achieve appropriate human control and respect of human dignity in armed conflict. The paper appeals to strengthened and new forms of international binding instrument to ensure that there is substantial human control of AWS, and also demands global cooperation.
Reference Key
imported_1793227123_6ae2797387010 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors
Journal Annals of Human and Social Sciences
Year 2025
DOI
10.35484/ahss.2025(6-III)14
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.