Use of Modality in the Punjab Textbook Board’s English for Grade 7: An SFL-Based Evaluation

Clicks: 7
ID: 334332
2025
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #575 of 1,064 articles by views in Annals of Human and Social Sciences

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 1,064 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
This study investigates the use of modality in the Punjab Textbook Board's English textbook for Grade 7 through the lens of Systemic Functional Linguistics (Halliday & Matthiessen, 2014). Seventy-three modal expressions were identified and classified by type, value, and orientation. Results reveal a dominance of deontic modality, particularly through high- and medium-value modal verbs such as must and should, indicating a focus on moral instruction and authority. Most modals exhibit subjective orientation, aligning with a behaviorist pedagogical approach. The limited variety of modals—especially the underrepresentation of epistemic and dynamic forms—suggests a misalignment with authentic language usage, potentially hindering students’ pragmatic competence. These findings highlight concerns about ideological reinforcement through textbook discourse and call for a more balanced integration of modality types to support communicative and critical language development.
Reference Key
imported_1793227069_6ae2793d6e4d6 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors
Journal Annals of Human and Social Sciences
Year 2025
DOI
10.35484/ahss.2025(6-II)34
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.