Stylistic Analysis of Margaret Atwood’s The Handmaid’s Tale and Bina Shah’s Before She Sleeps: A Comparative Study of Feminist Dystopian Fiction

Clicks: 8
ID: 334320
2025
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #241 of 1,064 articles by views in Annals of Human and Social Sciences

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 1,064 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Feminist Dystopian Fiction has assumed great significance in recent years. In this context, this study probes the impact of culture(s) and linguistic choices in the creation of dystopian narratives written by women. The research explores how the portrayal of feminist issues by contemporary female writers, Margaret Atwood, in The Handmaid’s Tale (1985), and Bina Shah, in Before She Sleeps (2018), is influenced by the cultural settings and stylistic choices. For this purpose, data has been collected through purposeful selection of important sections of text(s) from these narratives and analysed using qualitative textual analysis and Mills’ Feminist Stylistics (1995) framework. The study investigates how gender discrimination, reproductive control, loss of agency and identity are stylistically embedded in Feminist Dystopias. The study concludes that the culture(s) of both authors, namely, a white woman and a woman of color, impact their portrayal of gender discrimination, patriarchy, and loss of agency in their works. Future researchers can also integrate reader-response stylistics.
Reference Key
imported_1793227034_6ae2791aa8919 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors
Journal Annals of Human and Social Sciences
Year 2025
DOI
10.35484/ahss.2025(6-II)23
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.