Linguistic Construction of Forced Optimism A Transitivity-Based Study of Toxic Positivity in Dr. Quratulain Bakhteari’s TED Talk

Clicks: 7
ID: 334282
2025
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #546 of 1,064 articles by views in Annals of Human and Social Sciences

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 1,064 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate the transitivity patterns in the TED Talk by Dr. Quratulain Bakhteari. The study also aimed to explicate how the linguistic choices contribute to the construal of toxic positivity in the feminist discourse. Based on the Systemic Functional Linguistics, especially the transitivity model (Halliday, 1994), the study employed a mixed- method design. The study employed a quantitative frequency analysis of the types of processes. Then, the roles of various processes and participants were explained qualitatively to interpret their discursive meanings. Analysis showed that there was a prevalence of material and relational processes, whereas the mental processes acted as mediators that converted the emotional experiences into cognitive and moral solutions. The participants, like I, and pain were central in creating a self that was seen as active and strong, but one which was not emotional. The results are valuable to discourse and gender researchers since they show how the linguistic constructions could normalize the endurance of emotion and self-control in the name of empowerment and provide an insight into how feminist rhetoric could reproduce the nuances of toxic positivity
Reference Key
imported_1793226934_6ae278b676f47 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors
Journal Annals of Human and Social Sciences
Year 2025
DOI
10.35484/ahss.2025(6-IV)15
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.