Self-Esteem and Vigilant Decision-Making in University Students: A Moderated Mediation Model of Peer Influence and Extraversion

Clicks: 7
ID: 334265
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #533 of 1,064 articles by views in Annals of Human and Social Sciences

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 1,064 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
University students face complex academic, personal, and social decisions that have a significant impact on their future. These decisions are not only shaped by cognitive abilities but are also influenced by social and psychological factors including self-esteem, peer influence, and personality traits. This study examined the relationship between self-esteem and vigilant decision-making, with a focus on the mediating role of resistance to peer influence and the moderating role of extraversion. A correlational, cross-sectional design was employed on a sample of 300 undergraduate students, recruited through a purposive sampling technique. Data was collected using the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale, Melbourne Decision-Making Questionnaire, Resistance to Peer Influence Scale, and the HEXACO personality inventory. The results of the study indicated that self-esteem was positively associated with vigilant decision-making style and resistance to peer influence mediated the relationship between self-esteem and vigilant decision-making. This indirect relationship was significantly moderated by extraversion trait. The findings emphasize the collective role of psychological and social factors in shaping students’ decision-making processes, highlighting that these contextual factors should be critically considered when designing student development programs to enhance adaptive and autonomous decision- making.
Reference Key
imported_1793226883_6ae27883be110 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors
Journal Annals of Human and Social Sciences
Year 2026
DOI
10.35484/ahss.2026(7-I)24
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.