The fantasies of economics

Clicks: 21
ID: 334100
2026
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #19 of 30 articles by views in cambridge journal of economics

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Abstract As the discipline of economics evolved, it relied on a variety of concepts that are now understood to be untenable. Three of these fantasies are of interest here: (1) economics is a value-free (objective) science; (2) economics is the science of choice; and (3) economics offers necessary truth rules for collective choices in the public sphere. Underlying these fantasies is the continuing preoccupation with the individual. Nowhere is this more apparent than in the elaborate and enduring contestation between Amartya Sen and Robert Sugden. The purpose of the above fantasies was to elucidate what the individual could do in the interest of wealth creation and resulting social bliss. The market was the instrument—the means—of that beneficial furtherance, while the individual was the agent of that furtherance. We could not help ourselves. Our every move was socially instrumental. Sen and Sugden wish to change the subject. No longer should economists concern themselves with how individual participation in the market serves to benefit society. Forget the marvellous contributions of the butcher and the baker and those who purchase their wares. Economists should turn their attention to the many ways in which participation in the market serves to benefit the individual. The butcher and the baker—and their customers—will derive enhanced capabilities and functionings. Their respective freedoms and autonomy will blossom anew. Importantly, their engagement in the market will reinvigorate their faltering virtues. Fantasies and fetishes endure.
Reference Key
openalex_W7223693923 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Daniel W. Bromley
Are you one of these authors? Claim your profile
Journal cambridge journal of economics
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/cje/beag034
URL
https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/beag034
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.