Pharmacy students’ perception of OSCE exam clinical skills and competencies assessment

Clicks: 11
ID: 334085
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #26 of 27 articles by views in international journal of pharmacy practice

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract Objectives This study aimed to evaluate pharmacy students’ perceptions of Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) content, assessment, logistics, and formative and summative components, and to identify factors associated with perceived clinical competency development following OSCE participation. Methods A cross-sectional census study was conducted among pharmacy students at Zarqa University, Jordan (n = 123). Data were collected online using Microsoft Teams and analyzed using descriptive statistics, nonparametric tests, correlation analyses, and multiple linear regression. Key findings Most students reported that OSCE cases were aligned with taught content (77.3%) and effectively assessed communication (75.6%), clinical skills (76.4%), and applied knowledge (70.1%). The OSCE was perceived as superior to written examinations for evaluating clinical skills (79.7%) and as a fair measure of clinical competence (77.3%); however, it was also viewed as more stressful (58.5%) and challenging to prepare for (61.0%). Formative assessment activities were perceived positively and were associated with enhanced confidence, motivation, and preparedness. Students reported improvements across multiple professional competencies, particularly in communication, problem-solving, medication review, and collaborative practice. Perceived competency gains were strongly associated with formative assessment perceptions (r = 0.739, P < .001) and moderately associated with summative assessment attitudes (r = 0.626, P < .001), and both significantly predicted perceived competency development (R2 = 0.662, P < .001). Conclusions OSCEs were perceived positively and were associated with substantial perceived competency development among pharmacy students. Structured formative assessment emerged as a key contributor to perceived competence gains, supporting the integration of OSCEs within undergraduate pharmacy curricula, even in resource-limited settings.
Reference Key
openalex_W7223681278 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors
Journal international journal of pharmacy practice
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/ijpp/riag157
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.