A New “Asexual Scandal”: Independent Evolution of Ancient Planarian Fissiparous Lineages Challenges Phylogenetic Reconstruction Methods

Clicks: 14
ID: 333859
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #121 of 129 articles by views in systematic biology

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 129 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract Phylogenetic methods typically generate bifurcating trees reflecting monophyletic groups formed by populations. However, unexpected topologies sometimes emerge, raising questions about whether they stem from methodological artifacts or biological phenomena. In a recent transcriptome-based study of Dugesia species, asexual populations displayed an unusual phylogenetic pattern: instead of forming monophyletic groups, each individual emerged as a long-branched independent lineage, resulting in a distinctive "ladder-pattern." While such a pattern could result from methodological issues, its exclusive presence in asexual populations suggests a biological explanation—long-term asexuality. Traditionally considered evolutionary dead ends due to reduced genetic diversity and weakened purifying selection, extant long-term asexual lineages challenge these assumptions, being popularly known as "asexual scandals". Here, we test both hypotheses: first, assessing whether the ladder-pattern arises from methodological artifacts, and second, examining expected genomic signatures of prolonged asexuality or hybridization. Using transcriptomic and nuclear marker datasets, we employ state-of-the-art phylogenetic methodologies and intraindividual genetic diversity analyses. Our results confirm that the ladder-pattern is not an artifact. Comparative analyses with other fissiparous planarian lineages support the deep evolutionary history of these asexual populations. Furthermore, we demonstrate that retained ancestral polymorphisms obscure phylogenetic signals. Our findings highlight the limitations of traditional phylogenetic methods in the context of asexuality and underscore the need to renew the models traditionally used in evolutionary studies.
Reference Key
openalex_W7223462486 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors
Journal systematic biology
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/sysbio/syag079
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.