Communicating the Nicotine and Tobacco Risk Continuum: A Scoping Review and Framework for Future Messaging

Clicks: 12
ID: 333836
2026
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #160 of 164 articles by views in nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the society for research on nicotine and tobacco

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 164 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Abstract Introduction The U.S. FDA acknowledges that commercial nicotine and tobacco products (NTPs) exist along a continuum of risk (COR), yet strategies to effectively communicate this concept remain underexamined. This scoping review synthesizes peer-reviewed studies on COR messaging across NTPs to identify promising practices and research gaps. Methods Following PRISMA-ScR guidelines, we searched PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Scopus for English-language articles (2014–2024) that empirically tested comparative or modified risk messages across NTPs. Two authors independently screened and extracted data on the conceptualization, operationalization, and effectiveness of COR messaging. We used the Message Impact Framework (MIF) to categorize message effectiveness by message receptivity, precursors to behavior, and behavioral outcomes. Results Of 531 articles identified, 50 met the inclusion criteria. COR messaging was conceptualized and operationalized inconsistently across studies, with most focusing on binary comparisons (e.g., e-cigarettes/snus vs. cigarettes) rather than communicating the broader COR across multiple NTPs. The operationalization of COR messaging differed in message content (e.g., specific vs. general harm, reduced exposure vs. risk), feature (e.g., audience targeting, message source, numeric information), and delivery (e.g., placement, format). COR messages generally increased the accuracy of risk perceptions of lower-risk NTPs, though effectiveness varied. Conclusions This scoping review identified practical tactics and key challenges for COR messaging across NTPs, including heterogeneous design, confusion about “complete switching,” and unintended “halo effects.” We propose a definition of COR messaging and a framework to address the need for a standardized conceptualization and more comprehensive evaluation of its effectiveness in future research.
Reference Key
openalex_W7223466426 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Ying Zhang, Katrina Saladin, Xinyi Wang, Dana Tfayli, Meghan Bridgid Moran, Andy S.L. Tan
Are you one of these authors? Claim your profile
Journal nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the society for research on nicotine and tobacco
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/ntr/ntag234
URL
https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntag234
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.