Resignifying Good Governance in the Philippines

Clicks: 15
ID: 333746
2026
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #31 of 36 articles by views in diplomatic history

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Why, in their concern for the Philippines’ social and economic problems, do politicians and researchers from the center to the left obsess over national debt and caution against spending? Frustrated by his country’s political options and faced with this puzzle, Lisandro Claudio asks, how did austerity—as in, policies aimed at keeping debt and spending low through high interest rates and an expensive and restrictive currency—transform from a colonial ideology to an assertion of anticolonial nationalism? Claudio traces the discourse of austerity by analyzing moments of economic crisis in the Philippines. Dissecting orthodox accounts and offering alternative explanations from heterodox economic thinkers, the book offers a biting critique of austerity as the favored solution to the Philippines’ economic problems. Without a doubt, Philippinists, historians of empire and foreign relations, and economic historians have much to gain from Claudio’s carefully crafted account. The story begins in the colonial period when the Philippines “contracted” the idea that monetary austerity was the good, moral, and manly form of governance. Republican and imperialist officials and experts cast the Spanish system, and later Filipinos and Democrat colonial officials, as wasteful and responsible for economic crises. Republican colonial officials favored an import-consumer economy and a dear money policy based in gold. They believed that limiting spending would control potentially reckless and corrupt colonial politicians. As a consequence of restricting the money supply, however, austerity’s advocates stifled both Philippine development and the possibility of an industrial working class.
Reference Key
openalex_W7223444847 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Katrina Quisumbing King
Are you one of these authors? Claim your profile
Journal diplomatic history
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/dh/dhag058
URL
https://doi.org/10.1093/dh/dhag058
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.