Understanding Functional Recovery in Burn Survivors Aged 80 Years and Older: A Burn Model System Study

Clicks: 12
ID: 333588
2026
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #91 of 93 articles by views in journal of burn care & research : official publication of the american burn association

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Abstract The global demographic shift toward an aging population is transforming burn care, yet the “oldest old” (adults ≥80 years) remain poorly understood. Standard geriatric guidelines are not specific to this subgroup, a group exhibiting unique physiological needs and vulnerabilities. We conducted a retrospective analysis of the Burn Model System (BMS) National Database for adults aged 80 years or older (N=104).1 Physical Function, Ability to Participate in Social Roles, and Pain Interference were assessed at 6 and 12 months post-burn and compared to pre-burn and US population norm (aged ≥75 years) data. Despite sustaining moderate injuries (Mean TBSA: 11.7%), our cohort required prolonged hospitalization (Mean: 26.9 days). We identified a functional recovery paradox: while Physical Function scores were low (40.1) at 12 months, Social Roles scores were average (50.0 at 6 months and 51.9 at 12 months). Notably, referral to inpatient rehabilitation (IPR) was highly variable (8.6% to 42.1%) and correlated strongly with social support; patients living alone were three times less likely to receive IPR than those with co-habitants (17.7% vs 61.7%). In conclusion, burn survivors aged 80 years and older face persistent reduction in physical function but demonstrate resilience in maintaining social roles, suggesting that slow physical recovery does not preclude quality of life. Prolonged acute hospitalizations and variable IPR access highlight the need for geriatric-specific guidelines to address the unique physiological, social, and systemic barriers that challenge the "oldest old."
Reference Key
openalex_W7223325061 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Riley Voor, 김은엽, Kara A. McMullen, Jennifer Bell-De Paz, Tam N. Pham, Karen J. Kowalske
Are you one of these authors? Claim your profile
Journal journal of burn care & research : official publication of the american burn association
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/jbcr/irag178
URL
https://doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/irag178
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.