The Rise of Alternatives

Clicks: 16
ID: 333573
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #172 of 209 articles by views in review of financial studies

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 209 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract Since the 2000s, U.S. public pension funds have actively shifted their risky investments away from public equities and toward alternative assets like private equity and hedge funds—some much more than others. We explore a range of possible explanations for these trends and argue that beliefs about the risk-adjusted return of alternatives have played a central role. Pension beliefs are shaped by investment consultants, peers, and experience in the 1990s. Other demand-side channels related to risk-seeking motives, spending needs, and fund governance have weaker empirical support. We also consider supply-side factors and agency interpretations of the data. (JEL G11, G23, G41, H75)
Reference Key
openalex_W7223304460 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors
Journal review of financial studies
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/rfs/hhag091
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.