Relative distribution of reported illness presentations among ill international travellers: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Clicks: 4
ID: 333486
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #74 of 75 articles by views in international journal of travel medicine and global health

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract Background Travel-related illness challenges clinical care and public health surveillance. Gastrointestinal, febrile/systemic, and respiratory presentations contribute substantially to morbidity, but their subgroup-specific distribution, which may help align clinical and public-health priorities with traveller profiles, has not been quantitatively synthesised. We aimed to describe the relative distribution of reported illness presentations across major syndrome/system categories among ill international travellers. Methods We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies published between 2000 and 2025. Epidemiological studies reporting illness acquired during or following international travel were included. For each syndrome/system category (e.g., gastrointestinal, febrile/systemic), we estimated the pooled proportion using the IVhet model, with subgroup analyses by travel purpose (tourism, visiting friends and relatives [VFR], and business), destination income group (non-high-income vs high-income destinations), and age group. Results 80 articles met the inclusion criteria. Among tourists, gastrointestinal illness was the most frequent (42.7%; 95% CI 22.3–57.8), followed by dermatological/bite-related (30.7%; 95% CI 12.8–45.6) and febrile/systemic illness (25.4%; 95% CI 9.1–39.9). Among business travellers, gastrointestinal illness (53.8%; 95% CI 34.5–64.3) accounted for the largest pooled proportion, followed by febrile/systemic illness (34.4%; 95% CI 18.2–45.9). Among VFR travellers, febrile/systemic was most frequent (64.5%; 95% CI 38.1–72.9). Among travellers to non-high-income destinations, gastrointestinal (37.9%; 95% CI 23.8–47.4) and febrile/systemic (34.4%; 95% CI 20.9–43.9) illnesses were the most frequent; and among travellers to high-income destinations, respiratory (36.5%; 95% CI 18.6–49.4) and dermatological/bite-related (32.0%; 95% CI 15.1–44.8) illnesses were most frequent. Conclusions The pooled estimates describe the relative distribution of illness presentations represented in the included evidence. Subgroup-specific patterns may provide context for pre-travel counselling, post-travel assessment, diagnostic prioritisation, and syndromic surveillance but should not be interpreted as static or universally applicable proportions or as absolute risks among all travellers.
Reference Key
openalex_W7223221813 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Jiaxin Zhao, Colleen Lau, Nicolas Smoll, Benn K. D. Sartorius, Alec S. Henderson, Deborah J Mills, Luis Furuya‐Kanamori
Journal international journal of travel medicine and global health
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/jtm/taag097
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.