The evaporation of context: Epistemic agency and the problematic of ‘understanding’ in social work scholarship in the age of generative AI

Clicks: 16
ID: 333427
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #30 of 34 articles by views in The British Journal of Social Work

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract The growing use of generative artificial intelligence (AI) in academic writing raises questions about authorship, reflexivity, and epistemic responsibility in social work scholarship. This study examines whether generative AI can reproduce not only the structural features of scholarly discourse but also the reflexive and contextually embedded knowledge practices central to critical social work. A qualitative comparative case design was employed, comparing a human-authored article on multicultural social work (2010, Turkish context) with an AI-generated text produced under controlled conditions using identical references and thematic structure. Analysis focused on three dimensions: theoretical integration, reflexivity and epistemic positioning, and contextual embeddedness. While the AI-generated text demonstrated strong structural coherence and citation alignment, differences emerged in dialectical engagement, explicit normative positioning, and national contextual grounding. The findings suggest that generative AI can simulate disciplinary discourse but does not inherently enact accountable epistemic agency, underscoring the continuing importance of reflexive human authorship.
Reference Key
openalex_W7223206068 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors
Journal The British Journal of Social Work
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/bjsw/bcag268
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.