Synergistic contributions of periodic and aperiodic cortical activity to motor recovery prediction after stroke

Clicks: 9
ID: 333391
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #183 of 196 articles by views in Brain communications

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 196 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract Functional motor recovery in chronic stroke can be promoted by intensive exercise aided by neurotechnology, yet reliable physiological markers to predict recovery remain limited. Scalp electroencephalography (EEG) is widely used in clinical routines, but conventional band-power metrics conflate oscillatory (periodic) and broadband (aperiodic) activity, limiting their interpretability. Here, we tested whether EEG spectral profiles predict motor recovery in chronic stroke. Resting-state EEG (1 min) was recorded at admission and discharge using a portable system (N = 41) and parameterized with a spectral decomposition model. Parameters were examined in relation to motor improvement, as indexed by gain in a clinical score, and used to construct a prediction model. Ipsilesional periodic activity at the individual alpha frequency (IAF) significantly increased after rehabilitation (p = 0.024) and correlated with motor improvement (r = 0.39, p = 0.010). A stepwise regression model identified higher IAF peaks, steeper aperiodic slopes, and their interaction as predictors of recovery (Severe group: R2 = 0.53, p = 0.003; balanced accuracy = 88%). The model outperformed a delta–alpha ratio–based approach commonly used in stroke prognosis. These findings indicate that the synergistic interaction between periodic and aperiodic activity provides a mechanistically meaningful and clinically relevant biomarker of residual plasticity, supporting individualized rehabilitation strategies in chronic stroke.
Reference Key
openalex_W7223106849 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors
Journal Brain communications
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/braincomms/fcag400
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.