Experience affects novel object aversion and the use of human cues in rural and urban American crows

Clicks: 15
ID: 333146
2026
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #52 of 68 articles by views in behavioral ecology

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Abstract Population differences in behavior can result from experience, which can be drastically different between environments such as urban and rural areas. Urban areas may be more complex, contain more human-made objects but fewer natural objects, or have more non-threatening people. Consequently, animals in urban and rural populations may differ in neophobia levels, what is novel, and attention to human behavior. We conducted two experiments with a common urban bird, the American crow (Corvus brachyrhynchos). On home territories of urban and rural crow family groups, we presented objects that were either equally novel in both environments or more common in one environment than the other. Separately, we measured flight initiation distance (FID) from an approaching person using either a direct or averted, less threatening gaze for individual crows across an urban gradient. We found that urban crows were more neophobic than rural crows, as measured by the probability of feeding near an object that is equally novel in both environments. There were no differences in approach and feeding latencies for the least neophobic family member. Both urban and rural crows were less averse to objects that were more common in their respective environments. In the FID experiment, crows in highly urbanized areas had FIDs 25 m shorter for an indirect gaze, while rural crow FIDs were unaffected by gaze. FIDs were best predicted by crows’ experiences with people in a relatively large area around each trial. These results highlight how experience must be accounted for when considering population differences in behavior.
Reference Key
openalex_W7214728112 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Dave Colucci, Anne Barrett Clark
Are you one of these authors? Claim your profile
Journal behavioral ecology
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/beheco/arag135
URL
https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arag135
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.