Forecasting risk-factor distributions by sex and age, 1990–2050: a parametric estimation framework using GBD summary exposure values, demonstrated for Australia

Clicks: 18
ID: 333139
2026
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #89 of 138 articles by views in International Journal of Epidemiology

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 138 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Abstract Background This paper presents a method to convert existing Global Burden of Disease (GBD) forecasts of summary exposure values (SEVs) into business-as-usual forecasts of risk-factor distributions. Method SEVs from the GBD are a relative-risk-weighted summary of risk-factor exposure, ranging from 0 (everyone below the theoretical minimum risk exposure level) to 1 (everyone above the 99th percentile of global exposure). Given the known inputs to calculate SEVs, with one additional assumption of the coefficient of variation of the risk factor, it is possible to generate parametric distributions (e.g. log-normal, gamma) of risk-factor exposures. We demonstrate this method by forecasting SEVs to 2050 by sex, age, and year for body mass index (BMI), systolic blood pressure (SBP), low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, and fasting plasma glucose in Australia. Results Our method generates plausible age- and sex-specific risk-factor distribution forecasts for Australia. Compared with the 2017/18 National Health Survey, fasting plasma glucose and LDL cholesterol agreed reasonably well in younger age groups, with wider discrepancies at older ages. SEV-derived distributions overestimated the mean SBP by ∼3–10 mmHg and mean BMI by ∼1 kg/m2 relative to survey estimates. The method was sensitive to values of the 99th global percentile of risk factors. Conclusion This method is extensible to any country or demographic group. To facilitate broader use of this method, we recommend further cross-validation studies for other countries and making key GBD data (e.g. 95th percentiles of risk factors) more publicly available.
Reference Key
openalex_W7223027459 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Bibha Dhungel, Tim E. Wilson, Stephanie Khuu, Tony A Blakely
Are you one of these authors? Claim your profile
Journal International Journal of Epidemiology
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/ije/dyag223
URL
https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyag223
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.