How Private Equity Fuels Nonbank Lending

Clicks: 29
ID: 333127
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #69 of 209 articles by views in review of financial studies

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 209 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract We demonstrate how private equity (PE) promotes nonbank lending by substituting for bank monitoring. Relative to non-PE-backed loans, PE-backed loans exhibit lower bank monitoring, smaller loan shares retained by lead banks, and larger shares held by nonbanks. The substitution is strongest when sponsors have greater incentives to engage with portfolio firms, is not associated with weaker loan performance, and persists during borrower distress. Our findings suggest that PE sponsors’ active engagement—through monitoring and support in distress—reduces banks’ need for monitoring and information production, enabling them to retain less skin in the game and sell loans to nonbanks.
Reference Key
openalex_W7223039933 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors
Journal review of financial studies
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/rfs/hhag092
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.