Mapping love in social work: A scoping review of professional discourse and practice applications

Clicks: 24
ID: 333096
2026
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #20 of 34 articles by views in The British Journal of Social Work

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Abstract Love is frequently invoked in social work discourse yet is theorized indirectly and unevenly. Recent syntheses have advanced love as an anti-oppressive ethic for the profession; this scoping review complements that work by mapping how love itself is defined, located, and problematized across the breadth of social work scholarship. We searched PsycINFO, Social Services Abstracts, SocINDEX, Social Work Abstracts, and Google Scholar using “social work” AND love-related terms. Forty-nine sources met inclusion criteria. Data were analyzed using descriptive frequency mapping and inductive content analysis. Love appeared consistently as ethical virtue, compassion and care ethics, and emotional experience (100 percent of sources each). Relational attunement, educational practice, community belonging, justice themes, and spiritual expressions were frequently represented (78%–98%). Barriers and risks appeared in most sources. Five clusters emerged: dispositional foundations, relational carework, participatory practice, justice and liberation, and guardrails and sustainability. Love functions as a multidimensional construct across micro, mezzo, and macro practice levels. Contemporary attention reflects recognition of relational depth within professional boundaries rather than rejection of ethical rigor.
Reference Key
openalex_W7223049456 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Monica Chi Eaton, Jocelyn Chung, Biatah Dzameh
Are you one of these authors? Claim your profile
Journal The British Journal of Social Work
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/bjsw/bcag246
URL
https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcag246
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.