Effects of Protein Intake on Gut Microbiota in Physically Active Individuals: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Clicks: 15
ID: 332824
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #28 of 42 articles by views in nutrition reviews

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract Context Protein (PRO) intake supports exercise adaptation and recovery, but its effects on gut microbiota (GM) in physically active individuals remain inconsistent across doses, PRO sources, and exercise conditions. Objective To systematically evaluate and meta-analyze the effects of PRO intake on GM in physically active individuals. Data Sources The PubMed, EBSCOhost, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were searched through June 2026. Reference lists of relevant studies and reviews were also examined. Data Extraction Two reviewers independently screened records and extracted study, participant, intervention, and outcome data. Eligible studies quantified PRO intake, included an exercise or physical-activity component, and reported extractable GM outcomes. Risk of bias and evidence certainty were assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tool and Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach, respectively. Data Analysis Random-effects meta-analyses using Hedges’ g, subgroup analyses, and meta-regression were performed. Eighteen studies (n = 819 participants) were included. Protein intake significantly increased the Shannon and Chao1 indices but not the Simpson index or observed operational taxonomic units (OTUs). A significant U-shaped association was observed between PRO dose and the α-diversity effect size, with the fitted curve reaching its lowest point at 1.5-2.0 g kg−1 d−1. Protein intake significantly decreased populations of Actinobacteria, Bifidobacterium, and Firmicutes, and the Firmicutes to Bacteroidetes ratio, and increased Bacteroidetes numbers. Subgroup findings suggested that age, body mass index, intervention duration, PRO dose, and exercise modality and intensity moderated the effects on Shannon diversity and Bifidobacterium abundance. Conclusions Protein intake appears to improve gut microbial diversity in physically active individuals but may also induce notable shifts in beneficial taxa, particularly reductions in Bifidobacterium. Future studies should prioritize individualized microbiome-informed strategies, evaluate long-term safety, and clarify the ecological impact of different PRO sources to optimize exercise nutrition interventions. Systematic Review Registration PROSPERO registration No. CRD420261288197.
Reference Key
openalex_W7222924901 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Zihan Bao, Meng Jiao, Mengqi Zhao, Fang-Yingzi Huang, Y. H. Liu, Shun Wang
Journal nutrition reviews
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/nutrit/nuag156
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.