Health risks of alcohol consumption in Aotearoa New Zealand: modelling to inform low-risk-drinking guidelines

Clicks: 20
ID: 332811
2026
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #72 of 138 articles by views in International Journal of Epidemiology

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 138 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Abstract Background The present study aimed to estimate the alcohol-attributable mortality in Aotearoa New Zealand (Aotearoa) at varying levels of alcohol consumption to help inform low-risk-drinking guidelines (LRDGs) in Aotearoa. Methods We used the New Zealand Alcohol Intervention Model—a multi-state life-table model parameterized with Aotearoa-specific alcohol and epidemiological data—to estimate the health risks associated with a daily alcohol intake of 0–100 g/day. We modelled a cohort of 12-year-olds for their life course, with exposure and disease rates fixed to 2018 levels. We used relative risk (RR) libraries developed by the World Health Organization (WHO) and Global Burden of Disease Study (GBD). The primary output was years of life lost (YLL), with 17.5 YLL used as a proxy for alcohol-related death, at lifetime-risk thresholds of 1-in-100 and 1-in-1000. Results When the WHO RR library was used, males reached a 1-in-100 risk of alcohol-attributable death at 8.6 standard drinks (SDs, 10 g of ethanol) [95% uncertainty interval (UI) 3.1–12.0] per week, while females reach this threshold at 9.2 SDs (95% UI 3.7–12.4). The removal of health conditions receiving a one-star evidence rating from the GBD substantially reduced the number of SDs to 2.7 (95% UI 2.1–4.6) for males and 3.5 (95% UI 2.9–4.4) for females. Across all analyses, use of the GBD RR library led to more permissive results. Ethnicity-specific results showed that Māori breach the risk thresholds at lower levels of consumption than non-Māori. Conclusion Our modelling demonstrates that the Aotearoa LRDGs are outdated and need updating to reflect contemporary understandings of the harms associated with alcohol use.
Reference Key
openalex_W7222900206 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Anja Mizdrak, Adam Sherk, Kristen Maynard, Tim James Chambers
Are you one of these authors? Claim your profile
Journal International Journal of Epidemiology
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/ije/dyag191
URL
https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyag191
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.