Should Medical Students Be Political? Doctors’ Perspectives on Patient Advocacy and Social Justice

Clicks: 8
ID: 332691
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #49 of 49 articles by views in SRAI Journal of Linguistics and Social Sciences

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Political participation among medical students remains a contested topic within medical professionalism, social responsibility, and professional neutrality. The study aimed to examine physicians’ perceptions, opportunities, and challenges of medical students’ political participation from the perspective of doctors in Jalalabad city. A qualitative study was conducted in Jalalabad, Afghanistan, using semi-structured interviews with 29 physicians selected through purposive sampling. Participants were selected through purposive sampling, and the collected data were analyzed using the thematic analysis method of Brown and Clark (2006). Thematic analysis identified four major themes: professional neutrality and patient trust, social responsibility and patient advocacy, opportunities and barriers to political participation, and advocacy at policy and governmental levels. The findings showed that the doctors’ perspectives ranged from absolute opposition to absolute support. Participants identified maintaining patient trust as a fundamental requirement of the medical profession, but at the same time, they emphasized the importance of active participation of doctors and medical students in health justice, defending patients’ rights, and addressing the social determinants of health. In addition, institutional pressures, social sensitivities, and professional concerns were identified as important constraints to political participation. The findings recommend that political participation should be included as a component of patient advocacy, social responsibility, and health justice, while remaining consistent with professional ethics and the preservation of patient trust.
Reference Key
akhtar2026should Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors
Journal SRAI Journal of Linguistics and Social Sciences
Year 2026
DOI
10.5281/zenodo.23181705
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.