Disability Integration in Advertising: A Critical Review of Inclusiveness in Marketing Communication

Clicks: 10
ID: 332688
2026
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #46 of 49 articles by views in SRAI Journal of Linguistics and Social Sciences

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Advertising shapes not only consumer behaviour but also the social imagination of who belongs in public life. Despite constituting an estimated 15–26% of the global population, persons with disabilities remain markedly underrepresented in mainstream marketing communication, and where they do appear, portrayals often follow a narrow, patronising script. This review synthesises the literature on disability integration in advertising across seven thematic areas: the scale of the representational gap, the theoretical frameworks that explain it, the persistence of “inspiration porn,” the distinction between tokenistic and authentic inclusion, the economic rationale for the disability market, the influence of social media and influencer culture, and pathways toward more equitable practice. Drawing on peer-reviewed scholarship, industry audits, and trade data, the review argues that the advertising industry has made incremental and frequently superficial progress, and that genuine inclusion requires structural change in creative and organisational practice rather than periodic visual gestures. The review closes by identifying gaps in the empirical record — particularly the absence of studies modelling the full path from portrayal quality to purchase intention in African markets — that warrant further primary research.
Reference Key
ita2026disability Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Oyokunyi Otu Ita, Unoh, Brightsolution Effiong, Aniekeme Finbarr Ukpong
Are you one of these authors? Claim your profile
Journal SRAI Journal of Linguistics and Social Sciences
Year 2026
DOI
10.5281/zenodo.23160550
URL
https://sraijlss.com/index.php/sraijlss/article/view/39
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.