The Bushveld Complex did not form from externally derived crystal slurries, whether crystal-poor or crystal-rich

Clicks: 26
ID: 332277
2026
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #30 of 87 articles by views in journal of petrology

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Abstract The Bushveld Complex is a classic example of an open-system magma chamber that grew incrementally through numerous replenishment events, with parental magmas sourced from deep crustal to mantle reservoirs. A central question is whether these replenishing magmas were crystal-free melts (normal to superheated) or crystal-bearing slurries (crystal-poor to crystal-rich). Here we address this question by integrating three independent lines of evidence: (1) depth and pressure of the staging chamber, (2) density and rheology of orthopyroxene-laden slurries, and (3) chemistry of cumulus orthopyroxene. First, regional geology indicates that the Bushveld Complex was emplaced into the ~23 km thick Transvaal Basin, with the floor of the intrusion lying at a depth of ~10-12 km (~3.0-3.5 kbar). The lack of intrusive remnants of staging chambers anywhere in the basin succession indicates that the staging chambers feeding the Bushveld Complex must have been located beneath the basin. Recent seismic and gravity imaging identifies the remnants of this staging chamber at depths of ~40–45 km (~10 kbar), thereby defining the most likely pressure conditions under which any parental melts or crystal slurries must have originated. Second, crystal slurries originating in this lower-crustal staging chamber could reach the shallow Bushveld chamber only if they were sufficiently buoyant to rise through the Transvaal Basin sediments (average density ~2700 kg m-3). Density considerations indicate that only crystal-free to crystal-poor melts satisfy this requirement, whereas the proposed crystal-rich slurries (from 22 mass% orthopyroxene to 62 vol% chromite) have densities of ~2790–3810 kg m-3 and are therefore too dense to ascend through the basin. Where orthopyroxenite layers are interpreted as sills, inferred crystal contents in the parental slurries (49–98 vol%) overlap and substantially exceed the rheological lock-up range, precluding their mobility and further challenging their emplacement. Third, if crystal slurries transported orthopyroxene crystals from a ~10 kbar staging chamber, those crystals should preserve the chemical signature of high-pressure crystallization. Experimental crystallization of Bushveld-type magmas at ~10 kbar produces orthopyroxene enriched in Al₂O₃ (~3.5–7.0 wt%) and Cr₂O₃ (~1.7–2.2 wt%), providing a quantitative benchmark for high-pressure orthopyroxene. In contrast, cumulus orthopyroxene throughout the entire Bushveld Complex is consistently low in Al₂O₃ (<1.5 wt%) and Cr₂O₃ (<0.5 wt%). This discrepancy cannot be explained by post-cumulus re-equilibration, as all plausible mechanisms capable of lowering Al₂O₃ and Cr₂O₃ in high-pressure orthopyroxene are inconsistent with the petrographic and chemical characteristics of Bushveld orthopyroxene. This chemical constraint also excludes crystal-poor slurries carrying deep-crystallized orthopyroxene, even when their low crystal contents permit buoyant ascent. Finally, crystal slurry models require abundant phenocrysts and/or antecrysts, yet convincing field, textural and chemical evidence for this externally derived population of crystals has not been presented from Bushveld cumulates. This proposed crystal cargo therefore remains a postulate rather than a demonstrated feature of the Bushveld rocks. Taken together, the above three constraints, reinforced by the lack of evidence for the postulated phenocrysts in the rocks, rule out models in which the Bushveld Complex was assembled from externally derived crystal slurries. Instead, they indicate that the Bushveld Complex was built by repeated injections of crystal-free melts, with nearly all crystals forming directly within the shallow Bushveld magma chamber under low-pressure conditions.
Reference Key
openalex_W7221597490 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Rais M. Latypov, Софья Чистякова
Journal journal of petrology
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/petrology/egag091
URL
https://doi.org/10.1093/petrology/egag091
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.