Data driven feature selection and machine learning to detect misplaced V1 and V2 chest electrodes when recording the 12‑lead electrocardiogram.
Clicks: 386
ID: 33225
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Popular Article
62.6
/100
386 views
268 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
PopularRanked #3 of 6 articles by views in journal of electrocardiology
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Electrocardiogram (ECG) lead misplacement can adversely affect ECG diagnosis and subsequent clinical decisions. V1 and V2 are commonly placed superior of their correct position. The aim of the current study was to use machine learning approaches to detect V1 and V2 lead misplacement to enhance ECG data quality.ECGs for 453 patients, (normal n = 151, Left Ventricular Hypertrophy (LVH) n = 151, Myocardial Infarction n = 151) were extracted from body surface potential maps. These were used to extract both the correct and incorrectly placed V1 and V2 leads. The prevalence for correct and incorrect leads were 50%. Sixteen features were extracted in three different domains: time-based, statistical and time-frequency features using a wavelet transform. A hybrid feature selection approach was applied to select an optimal set of features. To ensure optimal model selection, five classifiers were used and compared. The aforementioned feature selection approach and classifiers were applied for V1 and V2 misplacement in three different positions: first, second and third intercostal spaces (ICS).The accuracy for V1 misplacement detection was 93.9%, 89.3%, 72.8% in the first, second and third ICS respectively. In V2, the accuracy was 93.6%, 86.6% and 68.1% in the first, second and third ICS respectively. There is a noticeable decline in accuracy when detecting misplacement in the third ICS which is expected.
| Reference Key |
rjoob2019datajournal
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Rjoob, Khaled;Bond, Raymond;Finlay, Dewar;McGilligan, Victoria;Leslie, Stephen J;Iftikhar, Aleeha;Guldenring, Daniel;Rababah, Ali;Knoery, Charles;McShane, Anne;Peace, Aaron; |
| Journal | journal of electrocardiology |
| Year | 2019 |
| DOI |
S0022-0736(19)30385-1
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.