Neural Processes with Normalizing Flows for Wheat Height Estimation

Clicks: 11
ID: 332241
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #14 of 16 articles by views in in silico Plants

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract In this work, we investigate modeling plant traits over time using neural processes, a class of machine learning models that learn distributions over functions. Plant growth is an inherently stochastic process with complex dynamics measured mostly at irregular times throughout the growing seasons. While individual trait trajectories may be simple, their distributions are shaped by complex interactions between genotype, environment, and other factors. In particular, we focus on plant height in wheat, a deceptively simple-looking trait with complex dynamics. To model these trajectory distributions, we evaluate neural processes and in particular extensions using normalizing flows, with different combinations of genotype and environmental covariates. For controlled evaluations, we generate synthetic wheat height trajectories calibrated against Swiss weather station records and the Field Phenotyping Platform 1.0 (FIP1) wheat dataset. To fully evaluate these trajectory distributions, we use signatures, vector representations of sequential data, together with the signature maximum mean discrepancy (Sig-MMD) and its recently introduced censored variant (CSig-MMD). Sig-MMD enables direct pathwise comparison of predicted and simulator trajectory distributions, while CSig-MMD focuses this comparison on the tail, including lodged trajectories. Together, these metrics allow us to assess whether the models capture the full distribution of growth trajectories, including rare outcomes. We compare the neural processes with a lodging-mixture spline baseline and apply them to the FIP1 data.
Reference Key
openalex_W7221706872 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors
Journal in silico Plants
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/insilicoplants/diag028
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.