Genomic and Clinical Determinants of Local and Distant Intracranial Progression Following Surgical Resection of Brain Metastases

Clicks: 8
ID: 332092
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #134 of 144 articles by views in Neuro-Oncology Advances

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 144 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract Background The role of molecular alterations in predicting local and distant progression following brain metastasis resection is poorly understood. In this study, we investigated clinical and molecular predictors of intracranial progression following brain metastasis resection. Methods A retrospective analysis of 228 patients who underwent brain metastasis resection at University of Pittsburgh Medical Center was performed. Tumor specimens underwent next-generation sequencing using the UPMC Oncomine Comprehensive Assay. Bootstrap forest analysis was used to identify top genetic predictors by variable importance for local and distant progression. Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify independent predictors. Results Local progression occurred in 110 patients (48.2%) and distant progression in 98 patients (43%). The most frequent genetic alterations were TP53 mutations (61.6%), KRAS mutations (31.2%), and CDKN2A/B copy number alterations (24.6%, 23.2%). For local progression, bootstrap forest analysis identified PTEN, STK11, KRAS, FGF3, and ATM alterations as top predictors. On multivariable analysis adjusting for primary malignancy type, independent predictors of local progression included RB1 mutations (HR 3.03, p = 0.003), PTEN copy number alterations (HR 0.25, p = 0.02), subtotal resection (HR 2.1, p = 0.04), and postoperative systemic therapy (HR 0.4, p = 0.002). For distant progression, PTEN, TERT, STK11, CDKN2AB, and TP53 alterations were top predictors. Postoperative systemic therapy (HR 0.45, p = 0.01) was the only independent predictor of distant progression in multivariable analysis. Conclusion These findings suggest that integrating molecular profiling with clinical factors may contribute to intracranial progression risk stratification after brain metastasis resection, though expansion of the dataset with histology-stratified analyses is warranted to confirm these observations.
Reference Key
openalex_W7221449735 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors
Journal Neuro-Oncology Advances
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/noajnl/vdag228
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.