Episodic memory retrieval with increasing task demand: associations with age, APOE4 genotype, and Alzheimer’s disease pathology

Clicks: 5
ID: 331681
2026
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #154 of 163 articles by views in Brain communications

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 163 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Abstract Episodic memory declines early with aging, reflecting reduced neural resources and diminished memory specificity. However, few studies have created a cognitive challenge with multiple levels of task demand to investigate this early subtle decline. Furthermore, it is unclear whether the genetic Alzheimer’s disease risk factor APOE4 and early Alzheimer’s pathology constrain the neural resources required to cope with increasing task demands. In this preregistered behavioral study named EMCOMP (Episodic Memory & COMPensation), we conducted a sentence-based episodic memory retrieval task where we manipulated retrieval difficulty by varying the required degree of memory specificity, thereby increasing task demands on episodic retrieval with five demand levels at recognition (novel foils, “old” target sentences, and three lure levels) and two demand levels at free and cued recall (gist and details). We collected data from 100 cognitively unimpaired adults (37 young (mean age 24 years), 63 older (mean age 72 years)) with additional neuropsychological testing and blood-based measures available for the older group. First, we investigated differences in EMCOMP episodic memory retrieval accuracy and confidence between young and older adults in linear mixed-effects models. Second, we investigated differences associated with the APOE4 genotype and plasma-derived Alzheimer’s pathology. Third, we assessed correlations between EMCOMP recognition and recall and established cognitive tests. Young adults showed higher recognition accuracy and confidence as well as a higher recall score and a lower recall error rate compared to older adults. As target-lure similarity increased there was a steeper decline in recognition accuracy and a steeper increase in high-confidence errors in older compared to younger adults and in older APOE4 carriers compared to older non-carriers. However, we found no associations with Alzheimer’s pathology. EMCOMP performance was positively correlated with established cognitive tests. Our study demonstrates age- and APOE4-related differences in episodic memory retrieval under increasing retrieval difficulty - differences that may not be detectable in paradigms with only one or two levels of variation. By manipulating sentence-based retrieval specificity, we provide a novel approach to detect subtle cognitive deficits and potential functional compensation in cognitively unimpaired older adults with risk factors or early Alzheimer’s pathology. Future research should extend this work to more diverse samples and combine behavioral assessment with functional MRI to examine underlying brain activation patterns and functional connectivity.
Reference Key
openalex_W7220865963 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Finja Askevold, Beate Schumann‐Werner, Niklas Behrenbruch, Svenja Schwarck, Eóin N. Molloy, Jonathan Erik Peelle, Ryan M. O’Leary, Arthur Wingfield, Gusalija Behnisch, Constanze I. Seidenbecher, Björn H Schott, Bárbara Morgado, Hermann Esselmann, Jens Wiltfang, Emrah Düzel, Anne Maaß, Larissa Fischer
Journal Brain communications
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/braincomms/fcag375
URL
https://doi.org/10.1093/braincomms/fcag375
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.