Aid cuts, health financing fragility, and maladaptive resilience in Sierra Leone: a rapid mixed-methods study

Clicks: 19
ID: 331585
2026
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #56 of 79 articles by views in Health policy and planning

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Sierra Leone's health system remains highly dependent on external aid, with donor funding accounting for approximately 47% of total health expenditure between 2020 and 2024, compared with a government contribution of around 25-26%. Recent reductions in development assistance for health, including a sharp in-year contraction of USAID-supported health programming during 2024-25 and an approximately 15% reduction in Global Fund allocations, have exposed major structural vulnerabilities in the health financing system. We conducted a rapid mixed-methods study to examine the effects of recent and anticipated aid reductions and the resilience responses emerging across Sierra Leone's health system. The study drew on a review of 19 documents and 11 key informant interviews with stakeholders from government, development partners, civil society, non-governmental organisations, and independent experts. Documentary and interview data were analysed descriptively and thematically, and findings were integrated during interpretation. Several service areas were identified as highly exposed to financing disruption, including reproductive, maternal, newborn and child health, HIV, tuberculosis, immunisation, and pharmaceutical supply chains. However, available evidence indicates that immediate service disruptions have so far been limited, and current data do not support firm conclusions about which services have been most affected. Maternal health and immunisation indicators remained comparatively stable in the short term. Documents and interviewees indicated that absorptive responses have prioritised core commodities and selected priority services, while reducing expenditure on outreach, supervision, training, logistics, and other enabling functions. Interviewees reported that households were absorbing much of the financial burden through increased out-of-pocket spending, forgone care, and informal coping mechanisms. Sierra Leone's response shows elements of absorptive and adaptive resilience, but several coping strategies show features consistent with maladaptive resilience and risk becoming maladaptive if prolonged, because they shift costs downward, threaten to deepen inequity, and erode the operational foundations of the health system.
Reference Key
openalex_W7220402958 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Augustus Osborne, Maria Paola Bertone, Halimatu Kamara, Ayesha Idriss, Sophie Witter
Journal Health policy and planning
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/heapol/czag117
URL
https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czag117
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.