EP4.3 A Computer Assisted Triangular Framework for Dimensional Digital Characterisation of Hip Morphology

Clicks: 10
ID: 331329
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #385 of 444 articles by views in Journal of hip preservation surgery

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 444 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract Background Conventional radiographic assessment of hip morphology relies on discrete angular and linear measurements, usually interpreted separately and referenced to normative geometric thresholds. In current practice, risk is commonly assigned by binary category, with hips labelled as normal or abnormal, stable or unstable, dysplastic or non-dysplastic. This links morphology to risk indirectly, through threshold-based classification, and does not allow direct titrated risk assessment across a continuous geometric spectrum. Conventional measures may also give conflicting information for the same hip, limiting consistent interpretation. Aim To develop and evaluate a geometric framework for dimensional representation of hip morphology, and to determine whether this framework can explain discordance between conventional radiographic metrics. Importantly the triangular framework incorporates, rather than replaces, established radiographic measures. Methods Pelvic radiographs from 39 subjects (78 hips) were analysed. Four anatomical landmarks were defined within a shared calibrated coordinate system: medial sourcil base, lateral sourcil apex, acetabular centroid, and femoral head centroid. From these landmarks, linked acetabular and interaction triangles were constructed, and geometric descriptors reflecting coverage, depth, congruence, orientation, and size were derived. Conventional radiographic measures were retained, mapped within the framework, and analysed using pairwise convergence testing, projection modelling, and principal component analysis to assess how they relate to the underlying geometric state. Results Conventional radiographic metrics frequently disagreed with one another when applied to the same hip. When acetabular depth ratio was included, 97.4% of hips had at least one measurement classed as within the reference range and at least one classed as outside it; after its removal, this remained high at 88.5%. Principal component analysis showed that the conventional measures largely collapsed into a single dominant pattern, with the first principal component explaining 71.3% of total variance. In contrast, the triangular descriptors preserved a broader multidimensional structure, with four independent components representing size, congruence, orientation, and coverage. Conclusion This novel morphological framework provides a structure that incorporates conventional radiographic metrics within a continuous, clinically interpretable geometric state space, providing the foundation for future outcome-linked risk titration and risk stratification in hip preservation.
Reference Key
openalex_W7220440822 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors
Journal Journal of hip preservation surgery
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/jhps/hnag043.337
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.