EP8.2 Is There a Difference In Patient Reporting Outcome Measures (PROMs) and Quality of Life (QoL) In Patients Undergoing Total Hip Arthroscopy After A Prior Ipsilatral

Clicks: 12
ID: 331301
2026
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #155 of 444 articles by views in Journal of hip preservation surgery

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 444 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Abstract Arthroscopic interventions have been developed for a range of pre-arthritic hip conditions. Sometimes, progressive joint degeneration ensues and joint replacement (THA) becomes necessary. We have investigated whether there is a difference in Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) and Quality of Life (QoL), after THA, for patients who have undergone a previous ipsilateral hip arthroscopy compared to those who had no prior surgical intervention. A retrospective review of patient electronic records and an outcomes database was undertaken to identify patients who had an ipsilateral arthroscopic procedure and subsequently went on to THA between 2013 and 2020. These patients were propensity matched against patients with no prior surgical intervention. An age, sex, ASA (2:1) matched cohort of primary THAs was used for comparison. The PROMs assessed pre-operatively, a 1 year and 2 years post THA were the Oxford Hip Score (OHS), EQ-5D and EQ-5D Health State. EQ-5D and EQ-5D Health State were also used to measure QoL. Fifteen patients who had undergone a prior ipsilateral arthroscopic surgical intervention were identified. The average interval between hip arthroscopy and THA was 30 months, SD 14 months. The average age at THA was 49.77 years. Pre-operative OHS was 18.67 compared to 17.11 for those with no prior surgical intervention (p-value <0.001). The pre-operative EQ-5D Health State was lower for those who had prior surgical intervention at 50.22 compared to 55.86 (p-value <0.0001). At 1 and 2 years post-operatively, OHS and EQ-5D were comparable with no statistical difference in scores or change over time. However, EQ-5D Health state, at both timepoints, was statistically higher for those patients who had prior arthroscopic intervention (p-value <0.0001). Patients undergoing THA after prior ipsilateral hip arthroscopy can expect the same degree of improvement in PROMs and QoL as those without any prior arthroscopic surgical intervention and a prior arthroscopic intervention does not adversely affect the patient reported outcome of subsequent THA.
Reference Key
openalex_W7220434665 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Irrum Afzal, Richard Field
Are you one of these authors? Claim your profile
Journal Journal of hip preservation surgery
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/jhps/hnag043.384
URL
https://doi.org/10.1093/jhps/hnag043.384
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.