TP1.3 Data-driven decision support for borderline hip dysplasia using statistical shape modelling and Discrete Element Analysis

Clicks: 11
ID: 331208
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #119 of 444 articles by views in Journal of hip preservation surgery

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 444 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract Introduction The management of borderline hip dysplasia (BHD), defined by a lateral centre-edge angle of 18–25°, remains controversial, particularly when concomitant femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is present. Differentiating instability-dominant from impingement-dominant morphology is challenging, creating uncertainty when selecting between arthroscopy and acetabular reorientation procedures. Current assessment relies largely on two-dimensional radiographic parameters, which do not fully capture the complex three-dimensional morphology of the hip. Statistical Shape Modelling (SSM) enables objective quantification of anatomical variation in three dimensions. This study aims to apply SSM to patients with BHD and FAI to identify significant morphological differences and determine whether specific shape features correlate with clinical presentation. Methods Eighty patients with BHD and concomitant FAI (LCEA 18–25°, acetabular index 10–15°, no prior hip surgery) will be recruited alongside 80 asymptomatic controls. Clinical data will include demographics, symptom profiles, physical examination findings, and radiographic measurements. High-resolution CT scans will be segmented to generate patient-specific three-dimensional hip models. SSM will be performed, with Principal Component Analysis used to identify dominant modes of shape variation. Multivariate analysis will compare morphology between groups, and correlation analysis will assess associations between shape variation and clinical findings. Results We anticipate that SSM will identify distinct three-dimensional morphological patterns in BHD with FAI compared to controls. Reduced posterior acetabular coverage and increased anteversion may correlate with posterior pain and features of instability, while reduced femoral head–neck offset may be associated with anterior groin pain typical of impingement. These findings may suggest that BHD represents a heterogeneous group with overlapping morphological features. Conclusion SSM provides an objective method for quantifying hip morphology in BHD with FAI. Linking anatomical variation to clinical presentation may improve diagnostic precision and support decision-making when selecting between arthroscopy and osteotomy. This may ultimately lead to more personalised treatment strategies and improved outcomes in hip preservation.
Reference Key
openalex_W7220415883 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors
Journal Journal of hip preservation surgery
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/jhps/hnag043.139
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.