FP16.4 Quantitative Functional Hip Measures Correlated With Patient Reported Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty Using Markerless Motion Analysis

Clicks: 12
ID: 331207
2026
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #55 of 444 articles by views in Journal of hip preservation surgery

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 444 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Abstract ICLA16 - Beyond the Operating Room: Value-Based Healthcare, Large Registries, and Predicting Failures, Auditorium B (BMCC Level 1), October 9, 2026, 14:00 - 16:00 Purpose This study aims to evaluate whether subjective patient-reported outcomes (PROs) correlate with objective functional hip parameters measured by a three-dimensional marker-less motion capture system in a population of patients with symptomatic hip osteoarthritis (OA). Methods Prospectively collected data was analyzed for patients who were indicated for unilateral primary hip arthroplasty for symptomatic unilateral OA. Patients were included if they completed a 14-movement, 82-parameter functional hip test, along with preoperative patient-reported outcome scores. Correlations between functional hip scores and preoperative PROs, including modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score – Joint Replacement (HOOS-JR), and pain scores (VAS), were analyzed to determine relationships between functional deficits and subjective patients' reported symptoms. Additionally, a comparison was performed to evaluate differences between subjects’ affected and unaffected sides. A sub-analysis by biological sex was also conducted to examine differences in these correlations. Results A total of 134 patients (54 females; 40.3%) were included in this study. Correlation analyses demonstrated multiple significant relationships between functional hip performance measures and biomechanical parameters with PROs. The HOOS-JR exhibited the greatest magnitude of significant functional parameter associations (13 (16%); r range 0.31-0.59), while the VAS demonstrated the fewest and weakest overall correlations (3 (4%); r range 0.32-0.53). Across PROs, the strongest associations ((|r|>0.4) were observed for unilateral strength, unilateral plyometric tasks, and unilateral lunge-based and step-down movements. Analysis stratified by sex demonstrated stronger correlations between functional testing variables and PROs (females r range 0.31-0.94; males r range 0.31-0.77). The most significant side-to-side differences were observed during unilateral squat and lateral lunge assessments (p < 0.001 for all), with deficits on the symptomatic side compared to the asymptomatic side. Conclusion Objective functional assessment using 3D marker-less motion analyses demonstrated meaningful correlations with previously validated PROs when assessing hip dysfunction for osteoarthritis. Additionally, the functional assessment successfully detected deficits in specific movement parameters between the surgical, symptomatic hip and non-surgical, asymptomatic hip.
Reference Key
openalex_W7220415480 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Keya Patel, Kavya Bomma, Benjamin D. Kuhns, Benjamin Domb
Are you one of these authors? Claim your profile
Journal Journal of hip preservation surgery
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/jhps/hnag043.124
URL
https://doi.org/10.1093/jhps/hnag043.124
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.