EP4.2 Femoral Head Divot - A Sign of Instability or Impingement?

Clicks: 15
ID: 331150
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #40 of 444 articles by views in Journal of hip preservation surgery

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 444 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract The femoral head divot is a rare radiographic finding in young adults with hip pain. While previous reports have hypothesized association with instability, there is limited literature describing the epidemiology and etiology of this feature. The purpose of this study was to describe the incidence of the femoral head divot, its topographical location on the femoral head, and likely etiology accounting for radiological characteristics and modelling. This is a retrospective, consecutive, multi-surgeon, cohort study from a tertiary referral centre. All patients reviewed in a hip preservation clinic between 2021 and 2025 were included. Exclusion criteria were age <18 or >55, no pre-operative CT, and previous hip surgery. Radiographic parameters were measured using standardized X-rays (LCEA, AI, AWI, PWI, crossover sign/ratio, alpha angle). CTs were assessed for acetabular and femoral version. Divot locations were identified using 3D CT reconstruction models. Collision modelling was performed on pre-operative CTs accounting for labrum, active hip ROM, and location of the divot; positions with contact between the divot and labrum were referenced to common positions of impingement. Non-parametric tests were used to compare hips with a divot to the contralateral hip and to symptomatic hips with no divot. Of 633 included patients, 33 (5%) had a femoral head divot. Patients with a divot were younger (36±9 vs 70±28, p<0.001), with no difference in gender proportion. Divots were unilateral in most cases (31/33). There were no differences in radiographic parameters between hips with divot and the contralateral hip, whereas LCEA (36.1±5.9 vs 27.2±8.1) and AWI (0.54±0.17 vs 0.45±0.15) were greater compared the group without a divot (p<0.001). All divots were located between 2 – 5 o’clock on the femoral head. Positions associated with the divot coming in contact with the rim included kneeling plantar- or dorsi-flexed, sitting with standard leg-cross, or being in a cross-legged/monk position. There were no anatomical differences in collisions between hips with a divot and the contralateral side. Femoral head divot is a rare finding on the antero-inferior surface of the femoral head caused by femoroacetabular impingement in functional positions of daily living, mostly occurring unilaterally despite symmetrical anatomy. These findings highlight the need for assessing version and impingement as an underlying diagnosis to guide surgical decision-making and management. Further studies are needed to investigate impact of the femoral head divot on patient outcomes.
Reference Key
openalex_W7220407414 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors
Journal Journal of hip preservation surgery
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/jhps/hnag043.336
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.