EP9.1 Agreement and Accuracy of OpenCap-Derived Joint Kinematics for Patients with Prior Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis

Clicks: 11
ID: 331097
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #199 of 444 articles by views in Journal of hip preservation surgery

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 444 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract Objectives Femoral deformity from slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) causes movement pattern alterations to prevent painful hip impingement. Understanding these alterations can inform diagnosis and treatment, however, socioeconomic disadvantages can prevent adolescents with SCFE from attending clinic visits. The objective of this study is to evaluate the concurrent validity of OpenCap markerless motion capture, which could allow remote movement assessment, with conventional optoelectronic gait analysis in patients with SCFE. Methods Eight participants (1F/7M, age: 15.3±1.7 years, BMI: 30.2±4.8 kg/m2) with SCFE treated with in-situ pinning 1-3 years ago underwent gait analysis using a 57-marker set, a 12-camera optoelectronic motion capture system (Vicon Motion Systems, Ltd.), and 3 force plates (Advanced Mechanical Technology, Inc.). Subjects performed a minimum of three trials each of three tasks: 1) walking at self-selected speed, 2) double-legged squat, and 3) sit-to-stand-to-sit. Ankle, knee, and hip joint angles were calculated in Visual3D (C-motion Inc.). Concurrently with the marker-based collection, two iOS devices captured simultaneous video recordings for automated biomechanical assessment using the OpenCap (www.opencap.ai) web-based application. Ankle, knee, and hip joint angles were extracted from OpenCap, time-synchronized with the in-lab marker-based data using cross-correlation, and normalized to 0-100% of the given task. Any trials with processing errors were removed, and the remaining successful trials were averaged for each task for each subject. The Pearson correlation coefficient (r) and root mean squared error (RMSE) between the average marker-based and OpenCap data were computed to assess waveform agreement and accuracy, respectively. Results Agreement and consistency were best for hip (median r = 0.982-0.993) and knee (r = 0.976-0.999) flexion, whereas hip internal rotation (r = 0.163-0.932) and ankle inversion (r = 0.239-0.533) demonstrated the lowest agreement and consistency. Errors were smallest for ankle dorsiflexion (RMSE = 7.0°-8.0°) and knee flexion (RMSE = 7.2°-8.0°), whereas hip internal rotation (RMSE = 15.7°-17.5°) demonstrated the highest errors. Conclusion Agreement and accuracy of OpenCap-derived kinematics appear to be subject-, task-, and joint-specific. Further algorithm refinement to ensure kinematic errors of <5° is crucial for realistic clinical implementation of OpenCap for patients with altered musculoskeletal biomechanics.
Reference Key
openalex_W7220396964 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors
Journal Journal of hip preservation surgery
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/jhps/hnag043.482
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.