FP13.2 Open Gluteus Tendon Reconstruction Utilizing a Bioinductive Bovine Patch Provides Comparable Short-Term Outcomes for Primary Gluteus Tendon Repair Compared to Acellular Dermal Allograft Augmentation

Clicks: 11
ID: 331033
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Popular

Ranked #88 of 444 articles by views in Journal of hip preservation surgery

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 444 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract ICLB13 - Outside the Joint: Mastering Extra-Articular Pain and Hip-Spine Basics, Session Room 6 (BMCC Level 3), October 9, 2026, 14:00 - 16:00 Background Bioinductive bovine patches have been well documented in the shoulder rotator cuff literature in the short term, having strong comparative outcomes in comparison to no augmentation techniques and against other materials for augmentation showing that they are a viable option for surgeon utilization during rotator cuff repairs. However, there is limited literature currently evaluating this specific augmentation material and its performance during hip abductor tendon reconstruction. Methods Patients undergoing primary gluteus tendon reconstruction by two surgeons with ≥1-year follow-up between August 2019 and February 2025 were identified for analysis. patient reported outcomes (PROs) were assessed preoperatively, and at 12 months postoperatively including Hip Outcome Score (HOS) Activities of Daily Living (HOS-ADL), HOS Sport Specific Subscale (HOS-SS), 12-Item International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-12), Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Interference (PROMIS-PI), and PROMIS Physical Function (PROMIS-PF). Achievement of minimal clinically important difference (MCID), patient acceptable symptom state (PASS), reoperation, and complication rates were compared. Results Ultimately, 29 acellular allograft augmentations were compared to 34 bioinductive bovine patch augmentations. Both groups improved from baseline for all PROs following their surgery (P≤.033). There were no differences in preoperative (P≥.158), postoperative (P≥.187), or change in PROs (P≥.309) between the two groups. There were no differences in individual PRO MCID achievement (P≥.133), however, the bioinductive bovine patch had a higher rate of Any MCID achievement compared to the allograft group (93.5% vs. 69.6%; P=.028). PASS achievement was comparable between groups (P≥.188). There were no differences in complications (P≥.243) or reoperations (P≥.057) between the two cohorts. Conclusions Utilizing a bioinductive bovine patch augmentation during primary open gluteal tendon repair is a viable option for surgeons to consider when addressing gluteal tendon tears. With no differences in PROs, complications, or reoperations, both bioinductive bovine patch and the acellular dermal allograft prove to be a safe and effective strategy for gluteal tendon augmentation in the setting of large gluteal tendon tears.
Reference Key
openalex_W7220387143 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors
Journal Journal of hip preservation surgery
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/jhps/hnag043.098
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.