EP1.20 Changes in Hip Range of Motion Following Periacetabular Osteotomy: A Single-Surgeon Case Series

Clicks: 11
ID: 331022
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Popular

Ranked #166 of 444 articles by views in Journal of hip preservation surgery

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 444 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract Periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) is the gold-standard procedure for symptomatic pre-arthritic acetabular dysplasia; however, its effect on postoperative hip range of motion (ROM) remains incompletely defined. While radiographic correction and pain improvement are well established, short-term clinical ROM data in a generalizable cohort remain limited. The purpose of this study was to evaluate changes in passive hip ROM following PAO through short-term follow-up. A retrospective single-center case series was performed on 148 hips in 148 patients undergoing PAO between July 2017 and December 2024. Patients were followed at 6 months postoperatively and again at a final follow-up time point (mean 18.1 ± 13.8 months). Passive ROM was measured by a single fellowship-trained hip preservation surgeon. Assessed variables included external rotation (ER), internal rotation (IR), flexion, flexion external rotation (FER), and flexion internal rotation (FIR). All five parameters were recorded preoperatively, intraoperatively, at 6 months, and at final follow-up, while flexion, FER, and FIR were additionally measured intraoperatively immediately following fixation. Mean ER increased from 45.2 ± 12.9° preoperatively to 47.4 ± 10.3° at 6 months and 48.8 ± 11.3° at final follow-up (p = 0.004). Flexion similarly increased from 99.5 ± 9.7° to 102.4 ± 9.5° at final follow-up (p < 0.001). FER remained stable across all time points (p = 0.444). IR decreased from 48.0 ± 15.7° preoperatively to 42.7 ± 13.6° at 6 months and 44.5 ± 12.6° at final follow-up (p < 0.001). FIR decreased from 34.2 ± 13.6° preoperatively to 26.3 ± 6.6° intraoperatively, 28.7 ± 9.5° at 6 months, and 28.0 ± 9.1° at final follow-up (p < 0.001). PAO mildly increased ER and flexion and reduced IR and FIR. Although statistically significant, these changes are modest and likely of limited clinical relevance for most athletic activities. These findings may improve preoperative counseling and postoperative expectation setting in athletic patients undergoing hip preservation surgery.
Reference Key
openalex_W7220384918 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors
Journal Journal of hip preservation surgery
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/jhps/hnag043.204
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.