TP1.1 Periacetabular Osteotomy for Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip in Patients Aged 40 Years and Older Achieves Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes Equivalent to Younger Patients

Clicks: 15
ID: 331019
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Popular

Ranked #16 of 444 articles by views in Journal of hip preservation surgery

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 444 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract Background Periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) represents the standard hip preserving procedure for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). However, age ≥40 years is frequently considered a relative contraindication, and the impact of advanced age on clinical and radiographic outcomes remains debated despite standardized surgical techniques. This study aimed to evaluate whether patients aged ≥40 years achieve non-inferior and equivalent outcomes to younger patients following PAO, using formal equivalence testing. Methods We retrospectively reviewed 124 consecutive patients with DDH (Tönnis grade ≤2) who underwent PAO between August 2014 and December 2024. Patients were stratified into a middle-aged group (≥40 years) and a younger group (<40 years). The primary endpoints were postoperative Harris Hip Score (HHS) and International Hip Outcome Tool-12 (iHOT-12). Equivalence margins were predefined as ±8 points for HHS and ±13 points for iHOT-12. Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was used to compute adjusted mean differences and 90% confidence intervals (CIs), accounting for confounding variables. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to assess the independent effect of age on achieving minimal clinically important difference (MCID), patient acceptable symptom state (PASS), and perioperative complications. Results Mean follow-up was 2.9 years in the younger group and 2.7 years in the middle-aged group (P>0.05). After adjustment for confounders, the adjusted mean difference was −0.38 (90% CI −3.58 to 2.82) for HHS and 1.44 (90% CI −3.69 to 6.56) for iHOT-12. Both 90% CIs were fully contained within the predefined equivalence margins, confirming clinical equivalence. Preoperative and postoperative radiographic parameters, including Tönnis angle and lateral center-edge angle (LCEA), were comparable between groups (all P>0.05). These findings suggest that patients in the middle-aged group did not demonstrate more severe baseline radiographic deformity and that the degree of surgical correction was comparable between the groups. Multivariable regression demonstrated that age ≥40 years was not an independent risk factor for failing to achieve MCID or PASS for either HHS or iHOT-12 (all P>0.05). Rates of osteoarthritis progression, perioperative metrics (blood loss, hospital stay), and complications (nerve injury, thromboembolism, surgical site infection, posterior column fracture) were similar between groups (all P>0.05). Conclusion In patients with DDH and mild osteoarthritis (Tönnis grade ≤2), PAO in those aged 40 years and older provides equivalent radiographic correction and functional improvement with no increased perioperative risk compared with younger patients. Age alone should not be used as an exclusion criterion for PAO. With appropriate patient selection, middle-aged patients can derive substantial benefit from hip preserving surgery.
Reference Key
openalex_W7220384013 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors
Journal Journal of hip preservation surgery
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/jhps/hnag043.137
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.