EP1.93 MyPAO patient specific planning and guides for periacetabular osteotomy: early clinical evaluation

Clicks: 14
ID: 330960
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Popular

Ranked #27 of 444 articles by views in Journal of hip preservation surgery

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 444 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract Aims Evaluate the use of the MyPAO planning and guide technology for performing periacetabular pelvic osteotomy surgery and assess product safety and early clinical experience. Population Inclusion criteria • Age greater than 18 years • Hip symptoms including pain, clicking, catching or giving way • Radiographic evidence of acetabular dysplasia (centre edge angle <24degrees) • Failure of conservative management Exclusion criteria • Evidence of hip degeneration (Tonnis Grade 1 or greater) • Known allergy to Polyamide PA12 • Unable to provide written informed consent Outcome Measures Intraoperative evaluation of the device including ease of use and fit to anatomy Adverse events and serious adverse events up to 3 months following surgery Surgical time Radiological correction of lateral centre edge and sourcil angles Results and Discusion We recruited 15 patients with hip dysplasia from The Royal Orthopaedic Hospital and Northumbria Foundation Trust, UK. We will present our early clinical experience, and outcome and safety data for these first 15 patients. Funding The research project was investigator led, however the research and equipment costs were covered by Medacta. Medacta were not involved in the design or conduct of the research.
Reference Key
openalex_W7220368463 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors
Journal Journal of hip preservation surgery
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/jhps/hnag043.277
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.