FP14.1 Exploring the Role of Spinopelvic Orientation in Low Back Pain in Patients with Symptomatic Hip Pathologies

Clicks: 13
ID: 330959
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Popular

Ranked #57 of 444 articles by views in Journal of hip preservation surgery

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 444 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract ICLA14 - The Extra-Articular Masterclass: Endoscopic Repairs, Ischiofemoral Fixes, and Complex Alignment, Auditorium A (BMCC Level 1), October 9, 2026, 14:00 - 16:00 Purpose Low back pain (LBP) is highly prevalent in patients with hip pain and may be attributable to variations in pelvic orientation. This study aims to assess the relationship of pelvic orientation, hip morphology, and baseline symptoms with LBP. Methods This is a retrospective study of patients with symptomatic femoroacetabular impingement or instability. Demographics, self-reported LBP, and 3D CT radiographic measurements were collected from medical records. Three independent reviewers measured pubic symphysis to sacrococcygeal distance (PSSC) on standing and supine AP pelvis radiographs, and pelvic tilt (PT) and sacral slope (SS) on lateral pelvis radiographs. Pelvic incidence (PI) was calculated as the sum of PT and SS. Independent t-tests were used to compare measurements between patients with and without LBP. Inter-rater reliability was assessed using ICC3k for pelvic radiographic measurements. Results 24 hips in 18 patients met inclusion criteria. ICC3k indicated good-to-excellent reliability. The cohort was majority female (72%) with mean age 30±13 years, and BMI 24.4±5.9 kg/m^2 . Patients with LBP had significantly higher BMI (31.3±4.9 v 22.7±5.0, p=0.019) with no other demographic differences. Patients with LBP exhibited significantly lower acetabular version at 12:00 (3.8 v 12.2, p=0.04), FNSA (128.7 v 134.2, p = 0.043), and greater alpha angles at 12:00 (54.7 v 40.0, p=0.003), 1:00 (55.2 v 46.9, p=0.049), and 3:00 (44.7 v 38.3, p=0.011). Patients with LBP demonstrated mean standing/supine PSSC of 38.0±6.8°/55.0±6.7°, PT 9.5±3.8°, SS 37.4±4.3°, and PI 46.9±5.0°, compared to 43.0±9.1°/53.6±5.6°, 9.3±1.9°, 41.4±5.1°, and 50.7±6.6° in those without LBP, with no significant differences between groups observed (p>0.1). Conclusions Preliminary findings suggest patients with LBP have higher BMI, decreased acetabular version, features associated with coxa vara, and greater alpha angles compared to patients without LBP. Differences may reflect underlying hip pathomorphologies between patients with and without LBP. Cam-predominant FAI and relative acetabular retroversion with reduced posterior coverage may contribute to increased mechanical demand on the sacroiliac joint and lumbar spine, potentially causing and/or exacerbating symptoms of LBP. Future investigation in larger cohorts is warranted to characterize these relationships further.
Reference Key
openalex_W7220368229 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors
Journal Journal of hip preservation surgery
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/jhps/hnag043.105
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.