DOES BEING A CHILDFREE IMPACT WOMEN’S HEALTH? EVALUATING CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH NULLIPARITY: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS

Clicks: 10
ID: 330939
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #314 of 330 articles by views in European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 330 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract Background and Aims As global trends toward childfree continue to rise, the cardiovascular implications of nulliparity in women remain clinically debated. Although several studies have examined parity-related risks, the relationship between nulliparity and cardiovascular disease remains inadequately synthesized. This study aims to analyze the association of nulliparity with cardiovascular disease risks and to identify the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms. Methods A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted across Scopus, Elsevier, Cochrane, PubMed, and NHS databases following PICO criteria. Studies assessing parity and cardiovascular outcomes, including major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) and metabolic risk factors, were included. The data were synthesized using appropriate statistical analysis software into baseline tables and forest plots (HR/OR) excluding studies with different measurement methods. The final analysis compared cardiovascular disease risks between nulliparous and parous women. Results In eight studies, nulliparous women showed higher risks for CVD (HR: 1.33; 95% CI: 1.12-1.58), CHD (HR: 1.64; 95% CI: 1.14–2.39), Stroke (HR: 1.40; 95% CI: 1.08-1.82), CHD and Stroke (HR: 1.49; 95% CI: 1.08-2.05), HF (HR: 1.46; 95% CI: 1.04-2.05), Hypertension (OR: 1.71; 95% CI: 1.06–2.75), and DM (OR: 1.27; 95% CI: 1.10–1.48). Conversely, five studies indicated that parous groups exhibited lower risks for CVD, CHD, and DM compared to nulliparous women. Conclusion Nulliparity has been associated with cardiovascular risks in women, although outcomes are varied by specific parameters. Further research with rigorous control of confounding variables is required to clarify this relationship.
Reference Key
openalex_W7220364952 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors
Journal European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/eurheartjsupp/suag119.037
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.