FP2.1 The Distribution Characteristics of Whole-Lower-Limb Axial Torsion: A Large-Scale DDH Cohort Study Reveals Deformities Primarily Located in the Proximal Femur with Rare Tibial Abnormalities

Clicks: 9
ID: 330923
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Star

Ranked #336 of 444 articles by views in Journal of hip preservation surgery

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 444 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract ICLA02 - Demystifying the Deformed Hip: Practical Principles of Pelvic and Femoral Osteotomies, Auditorium A (BMCC Level 1), October 8, 2026, 10:30 - 12:30 Aims While increased femoral torsion (FT) in patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is well established, the overall distribution pattern of axial torsion across the entire lower limb remains unclear. This study aimed to define the distribution characteristics of lower limb torsion in DDH by evaluating femoral torsion (including supra-trochanteric and infra-trochanteric regions) and tibial torsion. Methods We conducted a retrospective review of imaging data from patients presenting with hip pain between March 2024 and August 2025. The study included 254 DDH patients (508 hips), with a mean age of 29.6 years, 81% of whom were female. A control group of 61 non-DDH subjects (122 hips) was established. We measured the lateral center-edge angle (LCEA), Tönnis angle, anterior center-edge angle (ACEA), acetabular anteversion angle (AVA), femoral torsion (FT), supra-trochanteric torsion (STT), infra-trochanteric torsion (ITT), and tibial torsion (TT) in all participants. Intergroup comparisons were performed using ANOVA with Bonferroni correction, and regression analysis was used to explore factors influencing FT. Results The DDH group showed significantly greater FT (34.2±10.6 vs. 22.3±19.4, p<0.01), ITT (-12.1±8.0 vs. -16.4±7.8, p<0.01), STT (46.3±9.4 vs. 38.8±7.9, p<0.01), and AVA (22.1±6.6 vs. 16.8±5.1, p<0.01) compared to the control group. Notably, no significant difference was found in TT between the DDH group (22.1±6.6) and the control group (16.8±5.1). Regression analysis indicated that FT was correlated with acetabular deformity parameters such as LCEA. Distribution analysis further revealed that 78% of hips in DDH patients exhibited increased FT, but only 10% showed a concurrent increase in TT. Moreover, three-fifths of the total femoral torsion occurred proximal to the lesser trochanter. Conclusion Through a large-scale cohort assessment of the entire lower limb, this study systematically delineates the axial torsion distribution map in DDH patients: the proximal femur is the primary site of torsional deformity, while abnormal tibial torsion is relatively rare. This finding underscores that clinical evaluation and surgical planning for DDH should focus on deformities of the proximal femur.
Reference Key
openalex_W7220358382 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors
Journal Journal of hip preservation surgery
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/jhps/hnag043.009
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.