Pair-based covariance under mixed mating and its consequences for REML variance estimation

Clicks: 14
ID: 330842
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #356 of 392 articles by views in current genetics

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 392 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract This organism-independent theoretical study examines genomic evaluation of open-pollinated progeny from partially selfing species when the fitted genetic covariance contains only an additive genomic relationship matrix. Open-pollinated families contain selfed-selfed, selfed-outcrossed, and outcrossed-outcrossed sibling pairs, so their covariance must be averaged using joint pair probabilities rather than probabilities assigned to individual offspring. An offspring-level shortcut overestimates expected additive covariance whenever selfing and outcrossing coexist. Extending the pair calculation to the covariance between additive effects and dominance deviations in homozygotes gives a balanced-reference projection coefficient equal to twice the selfing rate under mating-system equilibrium and random unrelated outcrossing. When the solution is interior, this coefficient represents the exact restricted maximum-likelihood projection for balanced families with exchangeable covariance blocks. An independent Mendelian simulation with biallelic quantitative trait loci recovered the classical pair-specific coefficients without supplying them to the data-generating model and closely reproduced the theoretical coefficient, with a coefficient of determination of 0.9998 and mean absolute error of 0.0073. The additive genomic relationship matrix was constructed in a separate controlled marker simulation by VanRaden scaling, and additive-only restricted maximum-likelihood estimates closely followed the balanced-reference prediction, with a coefficient of determination of 0.9900 and mean absolute departure of 0.0107. The resulting dimensionless index and scale conversion are therefore sensitivity diagnostics rather than universal corrections for genomic evaluation designs.
Reference Key
openalex_W7171949745 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors
Journal current genetics
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/genetics/iyag273
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.