Food Assistance Programs Serve the Majority of Low-income, Homebound Older Adults, Yet Food Insecurity Remains

Clicks: 16
ID: 330776
2026
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #97 of 168 articles by views in Health Affairs Scholar

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 168 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Abstract Introduction Low-income homebound older adults face a disproportionately high risk of food insecurity, yet national evidence of food assistance program uptake among this population is limited. Methods Using nationally representative data of Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 and older from the National Health and Aging Trends Study Round 13, we examined Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) and Meals on Wheels (MOW) participation among 1,091 low-income community-dwelling older adults who were homebound and income-eligible for SNAP. Results More than half (55.5%) of low-income homebound older adults, representing 2.18 million nationally, participated in at least one program: 35.1% received SNAP only, 10.9% received MOW only, and only 9.4% received both. Despite receiving food assistance, 36.4% still reported food insecurity. We identified 1.75 million low-income homebound older adults who did not receive SNAP or MOW (non-recipients), among whom 24.0% experienced food insecurity and 21.8% lived alone. Among non-recipients, those experiencing food insecurity reported significantly more functional dependencies and were more likely to live alone than those who were food secure. Conclusion Policies that expand program capacity, strengthen screening for food insecurity, and streamline enrollment could improve access for this high-need population.
Reference Key
openalex_W7215042734 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Yiqing Qian, Mary Louise Pomeroy, Kaitlyn Tang, Laura J Samuel, Kali S. Thomas, Katherine A. Ornstein
Are you one of these authors? Claim your profile
Journal Health Affairs Scholar
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/haschl/qxag260
URL
https://doi.org/10.1093/haschl/qxag260
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.