Autoimmune Bullous Disorders Associated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Retrospective Review of a Single Center Cohort Over the Past Decade

Clicks: 24
ID: 330699
2026
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #69 of 245 articles by views in clinical and experimental dermatology

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 245 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Abstract Background Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) directed against PD-1, PD-L1, and CTLA-4 augment antitumor immune responses but may also induce unintended immune activation, resulting in immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Cutaneous manifestations of irAEs are among the most common, ranging from mild eruptions to severe autoimmune blistering disorders (AIBDs). Although bullous pemphigoid (BP) is the most reported ICI-related autoimmune bullous disorder (irAIBD), data on the spectrum, and management of other ICI-associated AIBDs remain limited. Understanding these reactions is crucial to managing treatment interruptions and influencing oncologic outcomes. Objective This study aims to comprehensively characterize ICI-associated irAIBDs by examining demographics, clinical presentation, disease severity, therapeutic approaches, treatment responses, clinical outcomes, and mortality. Methods A single-institution retrospective chart review was conducted, using a text-based database search from 2011–2023. Adult patients (≥18 years) with biopsy-confirmed AIBDs attributed to ICIs were included. Demographic, oncologic, and immunotherapy details, as well as clinical, histopathologic, and immunofluorescence characteristics of AIBDs, were reviewed. Treatment approaches, outcomes, and mortality data were analyzed. Results Forty-four patients with irAIBDs were identified, predominantly representing males (29, 65.9%) with a mean age of 70.4 years (range: 62-80 years). Lung carcinoma (12, 27.2%) and melanoma (9, 20.4%) were the most frequent underlying malignancies, and pembrolizumab (25, 56.8%) was the most common agent. Bullous pemphigoid (BP) accounted for most cases (36, 81.8%), followed by lichen planus pemphigoides (LPP) (6, 13.6%), with one case each of mucous membrane pemphigoid (MMP) and linear IgA bullous dermatosis (LABD). Pruritus was reported in most (42, 9%) patients, and upper (36, 81.8%), lower (32, 72.2%) extremities and the chest (34, 77.2%) were most often involved. Eosinophilic infiltration was present in most (23, 81.8%) of BP cases, and linear IgG and C3 deposition were the predominant immunofluorescence patterns in BP. Most patients received topical (34, 77.2%) and/or systemic corticosteroids (32, 72.7%), while 16 required at least temporary ICI discontinuation. Four BP (4, 9.1%) patients were treated with dupilumab. Other systemic agents used included doxycycline (22, 50%), intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) (5, 11.3%), rituximab (6, 13.6%), dapsone (1, 2.2%), mycophenolate mofetil (1, 2.2%), methotrexate (1, 2.2%), and colchicine (1, 2.2%). Three cases with Grade 3 severity necessitated permanent ICI discontinuation. Clinical stabilization (24, 54.5%) or remission of the irAIBD (16, 36.3%) was achieved in most cases. One death (2.2%) was attributed to sepsis in a patient with severe irAIBD. Conclusion ICI-associated AIBDs are uncommon but clinically significant complications. Most patients in our cohort continued ICI therapy during management of their irAIBD, while others required temporary or permanent interruption. These findings highlight the importance of prompt recognition and multidisciplinary management of these uncommon toxicities.
Reference Key
openalex_W7214948968 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Deborah Cull, Katherine Holder, Disha Chakraborty, Sydney Proffer, Anagha Bangalore-Kumar, Austin Todd, Julia Scott Lehman, Sindhuja Sominidi Damodaran
Are you one of these authors? Claim your profile
Journal clinical and experimental dermatology
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/ced/llag427
URL
https://doi.org/10.1093/ced/llag427
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.